Rohini Sindhuri, who served as the deputy commissioner of Mysuru and was also the managing director of the Karnataka Handloom Development Corporation, is at the center of a complaint alleging a significant financial loss to the state government. The complaint, filed by NR Ravinchandre Gowda, a lawyer and social activist, claims that the state incurred a loss of Rs 7.5 crore in the purchase of eco-friendly bags in 2021. The bags were reportedly procured at Rs 52 each, while the market price was only Rs 13, raising serious questions about the procurement process.

In an earlier move, the state government had declined to grant permission for prosecution under Section 17A of the Prevention of Corruption Act, which is designed to protect public servants from frivolous complaints. However, the court’s ruling indicates a shift in this stance, emphasizing that allegations of corruption must be thoroughly investigated and cannot be dismissed without proper inquiry.

Justice M Nagaprasanna further clarified that “departmental proceedings and criminal prosecution operate in distinct spheres, governed by distinct standards of proof and objectives.” This statement highlights the necessity for a clear distinction between administrative actions and criminal investigations, particularly in cases involving serious allegations such as corruption.

The court’s decision to order the state government to allow the Lokayukta police to file a First Information Report (FIR) against Sindhuri marks a significant development in this case. The complaint revolves around the purchase of over 14 lakh eco-friendly cloth bags, which has drawn public attention not only due to the financial implications but also because of the ethical considerations surrounding government procurement practices.

Moreover, the court criticized the government for its initial reluctance to review the matter adequately, reiterating the importance of accountability in public service. “Section 17A should not be used to block serious investigations, it is only meant to stop false complaints,” Justice M Nagaprasanna remarked, reinforcing the need for transparency and integrity in governance.

Rohini Sindhuri, a senior IAS officer from the 2009 batch of the Karnataka cadre, has previously been involved in a highly publicized feud with IPS officer D. Roopa in 2023, which brought her into the limelight for reasons beyond her professional duties. This latest controversy adds another layer to her already scrutinized career, as the implications of the court’s ruling could have lasting effects on her professional trajectory.

As the case unfolds, the public and legal observers will be keenly watching how the state government responds to the court’s directive and whether the allegations against Sindhuri will lead to further legal action. The emphasis on proper investigation and accountability in this case reflects a broader societal demand for integrity within public service, a sentiment echoed by many in the wake of rising concerns over corruption in government dealings.

The post Rohini Sindhuri: A Controversial IAS Officer Under Scrutiny appeared first on bangalinews.

On March 8, at approximately 7:30 a.m., Karnataka High Court judge G. Basavaraj was involved in a traffic accident while traveling on the Bengaluru–Tumakuru National Highway. Prior to this incident, expectations were that the judge would arrive at his destination without any complications.

Details of the Accident

The accident occurred when a truck unexpectedly took a left turn, prompting the police escort vehicle to swerve and collide with the judge’s car. This decisive moment led to a situation that resulted in injuries for the judge and two police escort personnel.

Injuries and Immediate Response

Judge G. Basavaraj sustained minor injuries to his nose, while the two police escort personnel also reported injuries. All injured parties were promptly transported to a nearby hospital for treatment. Fortunately, police reports indicate that the injuries are minor and that all individuals involved are out of danger.

Expert Perspective

This incident highlights the potential dangers faced by officials on the road, particularly when police escorts are involved. Traffic accidents can occur suddenly, and the implications can be serious, even if the injuries are minor. Experts emphasize the importance of road safety and the need for vigilance among drivers, especially in high-traffic areas.

While the immediate aftermath of the accident has been managed with medical attention, the event raises awareness about the risks associated with road travel for public officials. Details remain unconfirmed regarding any further implications of the accident on the judge’s schedule or duties.

The post High court of karnataka appeared first on bangalinews.

Decisive Change

The student, who had scored an impressive 92% in his Class 10 CBSE exams, was found with a mobile phone just 25 minutes after the commencement of his Physical Education exam in February 2025. Initially, the single judge’s ruling had favored the student, directing the CBSE to announce his results. However, the recent ruling by a division bench comprising Chief Justice Vibhu Bakhru and Justice C.M. Poonacha reinstated the CBSE’s penalty, which disqualified the student for two academic years under category-3 of unfair means in exams.

Immediate Effects

The court’s decision has direct implications for the student, who now faces a two-year disqualification from appearing in examinations. This ruling not only affects his academic progress but also sets a precedent regarding the strict enforcement of examination policies. The CBSE’s guidelines, which classify the mere possession of a mobile phone as an offense, have been ratified by a committee of experts and communicated to all students, emphasizing the seriousness of maintaining examination integrity.

Expert Perspectives

The Karnataka High Court articulated the rationale behind its decision, stating, “The mobile phone is an electronic device used for communicating and if a mobile phone is found in possession of a candidate during the examination, there is a high degree of risk involved in leakage of question papers and sabotaging of examinations.” This perspective underscores the court’s commitment to upholding the integrity of the examination process.

Furthermore, the court noted that once a penalty is ratified by a committee of experts, it cannot substitute its opinion with that of the expert body, reinforcing the authority of established guidelines in educational assessments. This ruling may serve as a warning to students regarding the consequences of violating examination protocols.

As the educational landscape continues to evolve, the implications of this ruling by the Karnataka High Court may resonate beyond the immediate case, influencing future policies and student behavior in examinations. Details remain unconfirmed.

The post High court of karnataka appeared first on bangalinews.